A faster recovery would have a minimal impact on renewable energy production, though it would enable more new renewables-based projects to be completed. This growth is smaller than anticipated before the Covid‑19 crisis, however. Despite supply chain disruptions that have paused or delayed activity in several key regions, the expansion of solar, wind and hydro power is expected to help renewable electricity generation to rise by nearly 5% in 2020. We estimate that total global use of renewable energy will rise by about 1% in 2020. The use of renewable energy in the form of biofuels declined in Q1 2020 as consumption of blended fuels for road transport fell. Along with depressed electricity demand, power grids have managed heightened shares of wind and solar PV. Renewable electricity generation increased by almost 3%, mainly because of new wind and solar PV projects completed over the past year and because renewables are generally dispatched before other sources of electricity. In Q1 2020, global use of renewable energy in all sectors increased by about 1.5% relative to Q1 2019. Renewable electricity has been largely unaffected while demand has fallen for other uses of renewable energy. The changes to model input parameters driven by moving switches in thisīlog post on the Climate Interactive website.Renewable energy has so far been the energy source most resilient to Covid‑19 lockdown measures. Model outputs are generated using the En-ROADS climate simulator.Įn-ROADS is a system dynamics model built byĪll assumptions, testing, and comparisons against the suite of integratedĪssessment models (IAMs) are available on the But in some cases the all-or-nothing terms of the debate may not match the potential effect on the real world. That doesn’t mean marginally effective solutions aren’t useful or important, nor does it mean an incomplete fix shouldn’t be pursued.
The most well-known fixes are not necessarily the most effective at stopping the planet-warming pollution. These are our starting points for the trajectories of greenhouse-gas emissions and global temperatures, and this is our underlying rule: There are no panaceas among climate solutions.
Read More: The Professor Who Turns Climate Change Into a Gameīloomberg Green has used En-ROADS as an engine to create a simplified scenario menu, streamlining the mechanics just enough to let regular people test their assumptions about specific climate solutions - and what it will take to keep the world below 2☌. It’s a policy simulator designed for use in role-playing workshops for negotiators, academic seminars, and as a learning aid for curious individuals. Would taxing fossil fuels be more powerful than a carbon tax set at $100 per metric ton? What happens to renewable energy if nuclear fusion becomes viable by 2030?Ĭlimate Interactive, a nonprofit think tank, has spent the last nine years developing a tool with the MIT Sloan Sustainability Initiative and Ventana Systems Inc., dubbed En-ROADS, that lets everyone test the impact of climate solutions. Whether you’re a head of state, corporate executive, climate activist or bystander, there haven’t been easy ways to test your preferences. That means we now have enough data to measure the relative effectiveness of major climate solutions.